<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post8960635066106524178..comments</id><updated>2008-08-13T13:12:43.176-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Pragmatic Theory: Blending 101</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/feeds/8960635066106524178/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html'/><author><name>PragmaticTheory</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03649152994150377282</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>9</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-7263250217048404256</id><published>2008-08-13T13:12:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-13T13:12:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Training a different blending function for each us...</title><content type='html'>Training a different blending function for each user is unlikely to succeed for lack of sufficient training data. However, training different blending functions for subsets of users is discussed in &lt;A HREF="http://www.research.att.com/~volinsky/netflix/ProgressPrize2007BellKorSolution.pdf" REL="nofollow"&gt;The BellKor Solution to the Netflix Prize&lt;/A&gt; (section "Combining multiple results").</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/7263250217048404256'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/7263250217048404256'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html?showComment=1218647520000#c7263250217048404256' title=''/><author><name>PragmaticTheory</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03649152994150377282</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='09671624379744012532'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-8960635066106524178' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/posts/default/8960635066106524178' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-1643696526067118668</id><published>2008-08-13T05:50:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-13T05:50:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Would it be feasible to have different per-user bl...</title><content type='html'>Would it be feasible to have different per-user blending functions? Maybe each algorithm that goes in the "blender" has a group of users on which it works best...</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/1643696526067118668'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/1643696526067118668'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html?showComment=1218621000000#c1643696526067118668' title=''/><author><name>mikado</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-8960635066106524178' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/posts/default/8960635066106524178' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-2135431686023361321</id><published>2008-07-29T17:24:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-29T17:24:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>LOL</title><content type='html'>LOL</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/2135431686023361321'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/2135431686023361321'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html?showComment=1217366640000#c2135431686023361321' title=''/><author><name>teCh poVerA</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09667792674070935337</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-8960635066106524178' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/posts/default/8960635066106524178' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-8051454185630238770</id><published>2008-07-29T10:52:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-29T10:52:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/101</title><content type='html'>&lt;A&gt;http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/101&lt;/A&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/8051454185630238770'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/8051454185630238770'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html?showComment=1217343120000#c8051454185630238770' title=''/><author><name>PragmaticTheory</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03649152994150377282</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='09671624379744012532'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-8960635066106524178' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/posts/default/8960635066106524178' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-8495010184942811602</id><published>2008-07-29T09:17:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-29T09:17:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Blending 101... What does the 101 mean ?</title><content type='html'>Blending 101... What does the 101 mean ?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/8495010184942811602'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/8495010184942811602'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html?showComment=1217337420000#c8495010184942811602' title=''/><author><name>teCh poVerA</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09667792674070935337</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-8960635066106524178' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/posts/default/8960635066106524178' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-4987481817232932105</id><published>2008-07-28T18:48:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-28T18:48:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The submission process works as follow:1) When a r...</title><content type='html'>The submission process works as follow:&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;1) When a result file is submitted, the last submit time is immediately updated on the leaderboard and a confirmation email is sent to the team leader.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;2) The server computes the score. It takes a few minutes.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;3) If the new result is the best so far, the best score column of the leaderboard is updated with the new value. An email with the new score is sent to the team leader, whether or not it improves on the previous scores.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;So the team leader receives an email with the submission score, good or bad. The leaderboard always displays the best submission score ever, together with the latest submission date/time. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Also note that you appear in the leaderboard only once you have beaten Cinematch once.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I'm sure that you can find more details on this on the www.netflixprize.com website. Look at the forum discussions if nothing else.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/4987481817232932105'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/4987481817232932105'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html?showComment=1217285280000#c4987481817232932105' title=''/><author><name>PragmaticTheory</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03649152994150377282</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='09671624379744012532'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-8960635066106524178' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/posts/default/8960635066106524178' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-7650334838182217549</id><published>2008-07-28T14:19:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-28T14:19:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Do you get results after you submit a resulting da...</title><content type='html'>Do you get results after you submit a resulting dataset? &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Or if it is lower than your last RMSE on the Leaderboard you don't get the  results?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/7650334838182217549'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/7650334838182217549'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html?showComment=1217269140000#c7650334838182217549' title=''/><author><name>upsfedex</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08179321526972918964</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-8960635066106524178' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/posts/default/8960635066106524178' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-4129018835071117416</id><published>2008-07-27T10:28:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-27T10:28:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>We have tried several blending methods, but I won'...</title><content type='html'>We have tried several blending methods, but I won't go into details here. We used cross-validation by splitting the probe set to investigate different approaches and select parameters. For official submissions, we don't split the probe set.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/4129018835071117416'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/4129018835071117416'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html?showComment=1217168880000#c4129018835071117416' title=''/><author><name>PragmaticTheory</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03649152994150377282</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='09671624379744012532'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-8960635066106524178' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/posts/default/8960635066106524178' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-4473468687596449137</id><published>2008-07-26T10:35:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-26T10:35:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Thanks for taking the time to write down all this ...</title><content type='html'>Thanks for taking the time to write down all this information. Could you care to expand a bit more on your blending method? &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I mean the actual blending recipe. Do you use some kind o neural network or just linear regression? Also, do you really use cross-validation (like splitting the probe in half or more parts and try combinations on those)?&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;My small contribution to the points made in this post: my gap between probe and test rmse is about 0.0065 +/- 0.0001 (so I can confirm your numbers)</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/4473468687596449137'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/8960635066106524178/comments/default/4473468687596449137'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html?showComment=1217082900000#c4473468687596449137' title=''/><author><name>teCh poVerA</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09667792674070935337</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://pragmatictheory.blogspot.com/2008/07/blending-101.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1878415438972163529.post-8960635066106524178' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1878415438972163529/posts/default/8960635066106524178' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>